Project Sherlock

Engineering

Engineering Practice & Failure

The professional and human side — where most catastrophes originate.

10 topics · 12 curated works

Topics

  • 01Foundations & Overviews1
  • 02Engineering Design Process1
  • 03Engineering Ethics1
  • 04Risk & Safety Analysis2
  • 05Root Cause Analysis1
  • 06Case Studies in Engineering Failure1
  • 07Standards & Codes1
  • 08Project Management for Engineers1
  • 09Technical Communication1
  • 10Cost Estimation2

Reading in Engineering Practice & Failure

12

A way in

  1. Start here

    No prior grounding assumed.

    Appendix F: Personal Observations on the Reliability of the Shuttle

    Richard Feynman · 1986

    Management estimated failure probability a thousandfold better than engineers did; reality cannot be fooled by public relations.

    +3 more at this level

  2. Then

    Assumes you know the vocabulary.

    Engineering and the Mind's Eye

    Eugene S. Ferguson · 1992

    Argues that engineering design has always depended on non-verbal, visual and tacit judgement rather than calculation alone, and that engineering…

    +4 more at this level

  3. Go deeper

    Primary sources and full treatments.

    On The Quantitative Definition of Risk

    Stan Kaplan & B. John Garrick · 1981

    Defines risk not as a single number but as the complete set of answers to three questions — what can go wrong, how likely is it, and what are the…

    +2 more at this level

12 works

Book1985

To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design

Henry Petroski

Argues that engineering progress is driven less by successes than by the close study of failures, because a design that works only reveals that it was adequate, while a design that fails reveals exactly where the margin ran out.

Book1992

Engineering and the Mind's Eye

Eugene S. Ferguson

Argues that engineering design has always depended on non-verbal, visual and tacit judgement rather than calculation alone, and that engineering education's near-total shift to the latter has produced real, traceable failures.

Report2015

NASA Cost Estimating Handbook

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Argues that a credible engineering cost estimate needs the same rigour as the engineering itself — documented assumptions, an explicit basis of estimate, and a stated uncertainty range — and that an estimate without these is a guess dressed as a number.

link checked 17 Sept 2026
Book2019

Engineering Rules: Global Standard Setting since 1880

JoAnne Yates & Craig N. Murphy

Traces how voluntary technical standards bodies came to govern engineering practice worldwide without the force of law, arguing they supplied a coordination among competing manufacturers that none of them could gain by competing on incompatible designs.

Paper1981

On The Quantitative Definition of Risk

Stan Kaplan & B. John Garrick

Defines risk not as a single number but as the complete set of answers to three questions — what can go wrong, how likely is it, and what are the consequences — giving quantitative risk assessment a checkable structure rather than a single expected-value figure.

link checked 17 Sept 2026

In order written

1981 – 2024
  1. 1981On The Quantitative Definition of RiskStan Kaplan & B. John Garrick
  2. 1985To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful DesignHenry Petroski
  3. 1992Engineering and the Mind's EyeEugene S. Ferguson
  4. 1992Root Cause Analysis Guidance DocumentUnited States Department of Energy
  5. 2009GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment GuideUnited States Government Accountability Office
  6. 2014NASA Space Flight Program and Project Management HandbookNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  7. 2015NASA Cost Estimating HandbookNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  8. 2019Engineering Rules: Global Standard Setting since 1880JoAnne Yates & Craig N. Murphy

Also covered elsewhere

This subject genuinely sits in more than one domain. These fields approach the same ground with different methods.

Elsewhere in Engineering